Oliver Twist free essay sample

Oliver Twist was written by English author, Charles Dickens. Charles was one of the best novelists in English literature. This book is about Oliver Twist, an orphan who leaves a workhouse and goes to London. There he meets the Artful Dodger, the head leader of a gang of juvenile pickpockets. Oliver is unaware to their unlawful activities. Oliver Twist, a young child, was the novel’s protagonist and stands out as the main character in this story. Oliver’s real, complete identity was a mystery in the novel. From what I gathered, he is an innocent and poor orphan boy who was born in a workhouse. Throughout the book, Oliver was surrounded by coarseness and cruelty. Even though he was treated badly, he is a charming, innocent child. In many ways, it’s hard to find Oliver’s character believable. He was raised in such corrupt surroundings, but his virtue and purity are absolute. We will write a custom essay sample on Oliver Twist or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Even when Oliver was manipulated and abused, he doesn’t become indignant. Oliver does not represent a picture of a boy that is torn between good and evil but instead, he is goodness incarnate. Some characteristics that I appreciate of Oliver’s is that he had the courage and was brave enough to run away to London, even though he was still such a young boy. Another characteristic I appreciated was that even though Oliver grew up in a terrible environment and was abused all the time, he didn’t let that get to him. Oliver was still innocent, charming and pure. He doesn’t even know what evil is and can’t even comprehend it. I think it is good for himself that he is so naive, but on the other hand it’s not good to be ignorant because he needs to know of what is going on around him, as he lives in such an evil environment. Oliver has such amazing moral values, which even the idea of stealing horrors him. His good nature must come from instinct, because he could not have learned how to behave from the workhouse. I believe Charles Dickens was inspired for writing about Oliver Twist because of his own childhood. Dickens wrote about the real world. He didn’t write about higher or middles classes, he wrote about the people and kids that were struggling during his time. He used a lot of the same ideas in the novel that he had to go through as a kid. I think the reason being is so that readers can see what it was like to live in his time. My personal evaluation is that the book, Oliver Twist, was an incredible book. Though it was very sad at some parts, it really made me think of the world we live in today. I can’t explain how much Oliver, as a person, has changed my views in a lot of ways. Despite being treated horribly, he still had such a graceful and pure positive outlook on life that I find to be inspiring. In some ways, it kind of shows that no matter what anyone goes through, they should remain positive and look on the bright side of their situation. His character almost didn’t feel real, because I’ve never seen or met someone with his characteristics.

Mapp Vs. Ohio Essays - Searches And Seizures, Evidence Law

Mapp vs. Ohio The Mapp Vs Ohio Supreme Court Case was a turning point in our nation's history. It changed our legal system by forming the exclusionary rule, which in turn changed the way prosecution of a criminal is performed. On May 23, 1957, three Cleveland police officers arrived at Dolly Mapp's home. They had reason to believe that paraphernalia and a fugitive of a recent bombing had been hiding out there. The officers asked if they could search the home without a search warrant, with the advice of her attorney she refused. Three hours later, four more police officers arrived to the scene. They knocked on the door but Ms. Mapp did not respond immediately. The officers then forcibly entered the home by knocking down the door and windows. Ms. Mapp demanded to see a warrant; but an officer showed her a blank piece of paper that he claimed to be a warrant. An aggravated with the situation, Ms. Mapp took the warrant and wiped her bosom with it. The officers arrested her an account she was "belliger ent" and "rude". While Ms. Mapp was in handcuffs, the police conducted an extremely though search of the house by breaking things and search through private drawers and desk. They found no evidence of a fugitive and of anything bomb related, however they did find some lewd, and lavacious reading materials that were illegal in Ohio. Ms. Mapp was ultimately convicted in the Supreme Court of Ohio on account of her possession of the pornography. The search was illegal according to a previous ruling in Wolf vs. Colorado; but Ms. Mapp appealed claiming it violated due process of law. In a 5-3 vote, Wolf vs. Colorado was overturned and the exclusionary rule of law was developed and determined to be applicable in all courts. In the process, it has greatly effected our legal system, and the way it is run. The justice had very important decision to make; to either protect the rights of the accused or convict criminals at all cost. The court concluded that protecting innocent people's rights i s far more important than convicting criminals. In 1949, the Court ruled in Wolf vs. Colorado, claming that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment did not incorporate the 9th and 10th amendments. Suggesting that the due process did not protect non-specified rights or was due process permanently defined within the states. Therefore, according to this case, the state of Ohio was completely justified in convicting Ms. Mapp for her possession of pornography. Since privacy and security is not one of our basic, listed rights, due process does not have to apply to protecting these rights. And certainly since due process in not laid out in black and white, Ohio could rule and construct due process in any way they saw fit. The Supreme Court of Ohio did convict Ms. Mapp on her possession of pornography. However, she appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1961, and the Court saw it necessary to review this issue and see what Wolf needed to be overruled. After reviewing the case, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Mapp and the exclusionary rule was developed. This rule said that illegally seized evidence could not be used to convict a person in a court of law. The Court came about this reason for two key reasons: it did not coincide with the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the Constitution. Justice Clack made these ideas clear in his opinion when he said "The ignoble shortcut to conviction left open to the state tends to destroy the entire system of constitutional restraints on which the liberties of the people rest. Having once recognized that the right to privacy embodied in the Fourth amendment is enforceable against the States, and that the right to be secured against rude invasions of privacy by state officers, therefore, constitutional in origin, we can no longer permit that right to remain an empty promise. Because it is enforceable in the same manner and to like effects as other basic rights secured by the Due Process Clause , we can no longer permit it to be revocable at the whim of any police officer who, in the